Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology

Dedicated to the medical research of human antiquity, Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: technology and Pseudoscience in Archaeology makes use of attention-grabbing archaeological hoaxes, myths, and mysteries to teach how we will be able to use technological know-how to profit issues concerning the prior. through putting wildly faulty claims in the context of the medical procedure, this vital supplementary textual content demonstrates how technological know-how ways questions on human antiquity and, in doing so, exhibits the place pseudoscience falls brief.

Show description

Preview of Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology PDF

Similar Archaeology books

The Mummy Case (Amelia Peabody)

Radcliffe Emerson, the irascible husband of fellow archaeologist and Egyptologist Amelia Peabody, has earned the nickname "Father of Curses"—and at Mazghunah he demonstrates why. Denied permission to dig on the pyramids of Dahshoor, he and Amelia are resigned to excavating mounds of rubble in the midst of nowhere.

The Dead Sea Scrolls: A Very Short Introduction

Everybody has heard of of the lifeless Sea Scrolls, yet amidst the conspiracies, the politics, and the sensational claims, it may be tricky to split delusion from fact. the following, Timothy Lim explores the cultural and historic heritage of the scrolls, and examines their value for our figuring out of the outdated testomony and the origins of Christianity and Judaism.

Biblical Archaeology: A Very Short Introduction

Public curiosity in biblical archaeology is at an all-time excessive, as tv documentaries pull in hundreds of thousands of audience to monitor indicates at the Exodus, the Ark of the Covenant, and the so-called misplaced Tomb of Jesus. vital discoveries with relevance to the Bible are made almost each year--during 2007 and 2008 by myself researchers introduced not less than seven significant discoveries in Israel, 5 of them in or close to Jerusalem.

Beyond War: The Human Potential for Peace

A profoundly heartening view of human nature, past struggle deals a hopeful diagnosis for a destiny with out conflict. Douglas P. Fry convincingly argues that our historical ancestors weren't innately warlike--and neither are we. He issues out that, for maybe ninety-nine percentage of our heritage, for good over 1000000 years, people lived in nomadic hunter-and-gatherer teams, egalitarian bands the place war used to be a rarity.

Additional resources for Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries: Science and Pseudoscience in Archaeology

Show sample text content

His organization with Dawson will be traced for thirty years sooner than Piltdown. Woodward’s habit towards the tip of his existence, although, turns out to not mirror that of a co-conspirator within the hoax, or maybe of somebody who was once conscious that Piltdown could have been a pretend. Upon retirement from the museum, Woodward truly moved with regards to Piltdown and persevered to excavate on the website in the summertime. that may appear to point out that Woodward maintained a trust that Piltdown used to be real and that extra learn on the website may perhaps show extra evidence of the importance of the unique locate. Suspect: Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Pierre Teilhard de Chardin has come less than scrutiny in addition, so much lately by means of Harvard paleontologist and chronicler of technology Stephen Jay Gould (1980). Teilhard is an affordable suspect simply because he was once current in the course of many 86 Dawson’s sunrise guy: The Hoax at Piltdown of the foremost discoveries at Piltdown. it's also the case, as Gould issues out, that Teilhard’s later reconstruction of the chronology of his involvement with Piltdown was once suspicious; at one element he asserted that he had obvious the is still of Piltdown II and have been taken to the location in 1913, which was once years prior to Dawson supposedly discovered them. it's also a bit complicated that, after the hoax was once unmasked towards the tip of his existence, Teilhard turned more and more reluctant to touch upon the whole affair or to elucidate his function in it. however the mere evidence that an embarrassed Teilhard pointed out Piltdown yet little in his later writings on evolution and used to be pressured in regards to the distinct chronology of discoveries within the pit don't upload as much as a resounding case. Suspect: Sir Grafton Elliot Smith The proof for involvement via G. E. Smith within the hoax is narrow, and it all is circumstantial. Smith used to be born in Australia, and his arrival in England was once rather speedy through the looks of the Piltdown cranium; therefore, a connection has been recommended. yet Smith didn't stopover at the Piltdown situation till 1915–16 and might have had no chance to have planted the fossils. equally, he may have had no purpose for doing so, keep to help his primary point of view of human evolution. His view of the temporal precedence of mind growth in human evolution used to be just like that of lots of his colleagues, so this on no account distinguishes Smith from a mess of scientists who welcomed the results of Piltdown, yet who had not anything to do with the hoax itself. Suspect: Sir Arthur Keith Anatomist Arthur Keith has been accused of participation within the hoax (Spencer 1990; Tobias 1992). in line with Keith’s personal diary, on December sixteen, 1912, he had written an nameless article describing occasions at Piltdown for the British scientific magazine. interestingly, this was once days prior to the various occasions mentioned happened (Spencer 1990:189). additionally, the thing contained info that, ostensibly, nobody yet Woodward, Dawson, and the hoaxer may have identified. additional, Keith knew or at the very least had met Dawson prior to he advised humans he had, and later he destroyed his correspondence with Dawson.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.85 of 5 – based on 9 votes